I don’t know how often this happens on subway systems elsewhere in the world (seemingly most dramatically in Japan, based on this movie I saw when I went through an extended J-Horror phase), but as someone who only takes the tube or rail once a week or so, it seems disturbingly frequent.
You thunder down the escalators and push through the crowd to your platform, barely listening to the station announcements in the background, until your ears pick up: “There will be delays on the Piccadilly line, due to a body on the tracks.” Which I suppose is the sedate way of saying: “Some poor bastard’s thrown himself in front of a train and, man, is it a messy scene.”
In the two or three times I’ve heard this unfortunate announcement, I’ve noticed an interesting reaction in myself, which is often visible or audible among my fellow travelers. First is, “God, how terrible.” And then seconds later, “Fuck, I’m going to be late.” I think this is a fascinating, alarming, and ultimately natural reaction, but how weird when you think about it. You’re hit first by empathy, almost dizzied by the pathos of the human condition, and then so quickly and practically the focus turns to how this unknown person’s initially unrelated tragedy is affecting you.
According to an article in Time from 2008:
Last year in the U.K., 194 people killed themselves on the tracks of mass-transit systems, with some 50 of those choosing the sooty tunnels of the Tube. New York City’s subway averages 26 suicides a year. In Paris, 24 died on the tracks of the Métro last year. While it is a fallacy to imagine any suicide as a solitary act — even the tidiest affair leaves survivors stricken — death by train is a particularly declaratory form of killing oneself. It makes the act a form of theater — for the driver, watching it all from behind his windshield, and for the rest of us.
And I suppose what the contributor to Time (who wrote the piece after her own train was stopped by a track suicide, or a “one-under”), has really summarized in the last two sentences above, is the third reaction I experience. That would be: “Why?” You don’t know what gender, age, or ethnicity this “body on the tracks” is, so you can’t begin to speculate as to the circumstances that lead to that moment. So I start to wonder why someone has chosen this particular method of suicide – was it a split-second decision? Was it planned? If it was planned, did they select a particular platform? Was it because it had meaning, or because they thought they would have a better chance of completing the act?
An article from a June 1994 issue of The Independent explains, gruesomely, that only 40% of attempts result in immediate death (this was in 1993, the number may be higher now). Quoting a report undertaken at the time:
The researchers were asked to determine the characterics of ‘high-risk’ passengers so that staff could better understand the problem. They found that of the high-risk group, 64 per cent were men, most 15 to 34 years old. The peak time for jumping was between 10am and 4pm, although there was a slight variation for women (10am to 1pm). The high season for jumpers was spring. The highest number of incidents occurred at King’s Cross. Mile End and Tooting Bec came next; both stations have psychiatric hospitals nearby. Archway, Oval and Clapham North followed close behind.
The article further details the scarring effects these events have on the drivers, which I imagine could be grievous. This concern ignited a huge debate over a recent movie, Three and Out, in which a train driver attempts to cash in on a fictional rule stating that if three people are killed under your train in a month, you’re awarded retirement and ten years’ salary as compensation.
May 27, 2009 at 2:56 pm
I’m kind of surprised that they actually say “there’s a body on the tracks.” Or maybe I’m just used to the MTA not actually saying why there’s a delay most of the time.
May 27, 2009 at 2:57 pm
On an unrelated note, WTF do I say (and write) “actually” so damn much?! I need to break this habit. Actually.
May 27, 2009 at 3:01 pm
It’s okay (hopefully). I’ve been noticing my own overextensive use of modifers lately, and they all indicate mildness: pretty, quite, generally, just, kind of, a bit, etc. It’s fairly frequent. GAAAAH.
May 27, 2009 at 3:04 pm
And they do say that there’s a body – I read that it’s supposed to reassure people that there hasn’t been an act of terrorism. And really, why wouldn’t they say? I’ve thought about this too, and it’s a public transport system, not elementary school, so there shouldn’t be a need to be protective.
More importantly, I imagine, you can’t blame the transport authority for delays if someone’s jumped in front of a train.
May 27, 2009 at 10:09 pm
I feel with the NYC subway system, individual conductors on the trains may tell you what’s going on. But if you’re standing in the station, just waiting and waiting, there often aren’t announcements about what’s causing the delay.
May 28, 2009 at 4:52 pm
I feel like if they announced there was a body on the tracks in NYC people would be pissed about being late, I mean there’s already enough rage over people passing out and causing delays in the summer, just imagine if they said there was a body on the tracks.
May 27, 2009 at 3:26 pm
The Dutch railways started announcing the reason for delays a few weeks ago, after research had shown absence of explanations pissed people off. So now we get “the people at the command centre let a slow train go ahead of us”, “the power went out and we don’t know why” and “there has been a collision with a person.” Generally, if it makes the news, then it was an accident, and if it doesn’t it was a suicide.
It always seems like a horrible way to go, when I think about it.
May 27, 2009 at 3:38 pm
“The power went out and we don’t know why.” Not exactly reassuring, but at least honest!
(Unrelated – let me know when you’re on town so we can meet up!)
May 27, 2009 at 4:04 pm
60% don’t die immediately? I confess that train death has been a backup plan if life got too painful (I’ve moved through it) and a girl from school killed herself this way. The appeal is quick death but if those are the stats, no thank you.
May 28, 2009 at 1:36 pm
I’d have to assume that someone willing to throw themselves in front of a train is beyond the suicidal gensture/cry-for-help stage, and this doesn’t sound like something you’d want to accidentally live through.
I hope you have a new back-up plan… Mine is to move somewhere tropical and become a beachcomber, or something.
Don’t know if it helps, but sometimes when something wonderful happens, or it’s just a beautiful day, or I’m feeling really good or connecting with someone or even just enjoying a great book, I’ll think, “if I’d died in the past, like I sometimes wanted to, I would never have experienced this moment.” Always worth remembering!
May 27, 2009 at 5:35 pm
Even worse, a few years ago a man suffering from a variety of serious mental health problems murdered someone by pushing them under a train. (http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2006/jul/28/mentalhealth.socialcare)
I try not to think about this though.
May 27, 2009 at 6:33 pm
My OOCD cannot abide this, such as. I can scarcely ride BART without seeing exactly how I’ll die: Standing in heels, reading a book patiently, whilst some wanker in a suit rushes past, bumping into me and knocking me off balance and right onto the third rail, where I’ll be electrocuted to death in a cute dress. Or the person next to me goes off balance and yanks me down with them.
HEY! CUTE DRESS! NICE SHOES!
My point is: I cannot think of saving myself AND be expected to fret over the suicides of others. It’s too much!
Last week, some woman flung herself off of the bridge that M takes to work. It’s just that she missed the water and instead hit one of the concrete base posts. That’s not exactly what she planned. She also stopped her car in the middle of traffic on the bridge, jeopardizing countless other drivers.
Why must some make a big, showy mess of it, you know? Why not just have some dignity about it, at least. Privacy. I don’t know.
Clearly, I’m a total cunt. Sorry.
May 27, 2009 at 7:45 pm
OMG. I don’t usually have that thought, but now I will. Thanks.
Actually, I was at the BART today after the baseball game, and there were a ton of kids there. This group of 20 kids was walking on that yellow section of the platform (right at the edge) WHILE THE BART WAS MOVING PAST THEM. I imagined one of them losing their balance or playfully grabbing one of their classmates, sending several little children into the speeding BART train, shredding their little bodies apart. Luckily, no such thing happened.
May 27, 2009 at 7:29 pm
Interesting. I’ve never thought about how the various means of suicide might be determined by psychological profile. For instance, someone who decides to shoot or hang themselves — it’s solitary and certain. Jumping off a bridge or in front of a train — so much more drama and less chance of actually killing yourself.
May 27, 2009 at 10:06 pm
Eh, shooting and hanging aren’t always certain. More certain than pills and various other methods, but they can also be screwed up.
I feel like a lot of it also has to do with what’s available and what the person feels capable of doing. Pulling the trigger is a very active suicide; standing in front of a train is more passive.
May 27, 2009 at 10:29 pm
The train I caught to my first highschool was near a high overpass bridge just visible from the station. At least three times, I remember my train home being delayed while police coaxed a potential jumper down off the overpass or cleaned up the remains of a successful one. And eerily, on one such occasion, a box of donor blood was left in the sun on the platform while its guardians went to help.
May 27, 2009 at 10:54 pm
I used to have both reactions, and even got angry at rubber-neckers (you know, those people who slow down to look at traffic accidents). But then a family friend was killed at an accident scene: he walked away from the initial fender-bender but was killed by an asshole who bogarted and honked his way thru the accident scene. CA law requires you to slow down for an accident for a very good reason. Where I gotta get to isn’t that important.
May 28, 2009 at 9:41 am
Well, the sad truth is there are a million ways to kill yourself that don’t involve other people so suicides like this are meant to affect the world around them. Throwing yourself onto train tracks means that for that poor bastard for once in their lives they know they’re going to have an effect on others. This is why it’s always during peak hours and not, say, 9:00 at night.
It’s like the story of the guy who left a suicide note reading “If one person smiles at me before I reach the bridge, I won’t do it.” Of course no one did. It’s pain of needing to connect and not being able to. Train suicides are sad on top of sad on top of sad.
May 28, 2009 at 1:31 pm
It’s a hell of a statement, isn’t it…
Let’s all smile at more people on the street. I like these small parcels of courtesy we can pass to one another.
And for god’s sake, if someone lets you pass in front of them in traffic, throw them a wave. Being polite is free, and it makes the journey more pleasant for everyone.
May 29, 2009 at 12:41 am
But the question that haunts me is did he try to initiate smiles and get rejected or just wanted a smile unprovoked? Granted, it’d be nice if we did it, but it’s sadder than sad to think a person who needed one didn’t know how to give one even if it meant saving his own life.
May 29, 2009 at 12:55 am
Sounds like he had reservations about what he was doing and was just looking for a “sign” – effectively putting the responsibility for his actions outside of himself.
May 28, 2009 at 11:33 am
I have a major issue w/folks that choose to take their life by getting in front of a train. They give no thought to the LIFE-LONG trauma they leave with the conductor of the train. This happened to a friend of mine that works as a conductor for Norfolk Southern, and he was forever changed. No train stops on a dime, so the conductor sees what’s about to happen and has ABSOLUTELY NO WAY to stop the chain of events. It’s horrific.
I’m truly sorry people reach the point where they feel they can not go forward and the only relief is through death. I just wish they would leave others out of their equation to exit.
May 28, 2009 at 1:27 pm
I was really interested to read about the “Caution: Suicide in Progress” signs that were used in Japan a year or so ago when suicide by toxic gas became more commonplace (this was the first link I found: http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=4523).
Maybe some people choose the public suicide option with the rationalization that they’ll spare their loved ones from discovery of the body? The trauma of discovery for anyone is terrible.
I sort of thought that the most “humane” way to do it, when I read this, was to perhaps post a sign outside a locked door, in the hopes that it would be the police or a medical team who actually enter.
I wonder what percentage of suicides are that planned out, and how many are spur-of-the-moment.
May 28, 2009 at 9:16 pm
Suicide has long held an accepted role in far eastern cultures, so I think they will undoubetly have an entirely different psych/socio framework for how it occurs in their society. Although I’m not deeply familiar w/their stats, I suspect suicide is approached in a private, non-public manner. Which is the antithesis of how it’s frequently approached in western society.
May 29, 2009 at 10:24 pm
in montreal they say there’s been a delay due to an “intervention ambulancière.” people generally assume it’s a suicide, though i checked out the stats and the number of actual suicides (some 120+ from 1986 to 1996, the most recent data i could find) is HALF the number of both “unsuccesful attempts” and attempts prevented by metro security (300+ each). i think they don’t announce anything more specific because they don’t want to give people ideas.
and maybe i’m wrong, but i’ve heard in a few places that the STM grants immediate retirement and full pension to any driver who has even ONE person jump in front of their train.